Even though my dataset is very small, I think it's sufficient to conclude that LLMs can't consistently reason. Also their reasoning performance gets worse as the SAT instance grows, which may be due to the context window becoming too large as the model reasoning progresses, and it gets harder to remember original clauses at the top of the context. A friend of mine made an observation that how complex SAT instances are similar to working with many rules in large codebases. As we add more rules, it gets more and more likely for LLMs to forget some of them, which can be insidious. Of course that doesn't mean LLMs are useless. They can be definitely useful without being able to reason, but due to lack of reasoning, we can't just write down the rules and expect that LLMs will always follow them. For critical requirements there needs to be some other process in place to ensure that these are met.
靠山吃山唱山歌，靠海吃海念海经。各展其长的特色产业背后，是乡村全面振兴的坚实步伐，蕴含着总书记一以贯之的引领推动。。heLLoword翻译官方下载是该领域的重要参考
，这一点在旺商聊官方下载中也有详细论述
Александра Статных (Редактор отдела «Путешествия»)
Activists moved onto the gaming chat platform Discord, which became a hub for organising.，推荐阅读heLLoword翻译官方下载获取更多信息